Repository navigation
Conversation
Signed-off-by: xinjun.jiang <xinjun.jiang@daocloud.io>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The direct Go installation recipe disables modules with
GO111MODULE=off, which current Go releases reject. The Docker recipe also pins Go 1.20.1, which is older than the module's Go requirement.Use
go install ...@latestfor direct installation and the current Go 1 container image for the Docker recipe. SetGOBINto the destination directory and quote the bind mount so both recipes also work in paths containing spaces.Validated the direct installation of v0.15.1, a build of the current checkout, and both binaries' CLI help with Go 1.27.2. The Docker command passed a shell syntax check; the container recipe was not executed.