Summary
wa_working_families_tax_credit_maximum_qualifying_income counts qualifying children without the IRC 152(c)(3)(B) permanently-and-totally-disabled age waiver, while the main wa_working_families_tax_credit variable counts them with it. On the state-only (ITIN) path, a family with a disabled adult qualifying child gets one-child credit parameters but a childless income ceiling — so the model denies or under-pays the credit.
The inconsistency
wa_working_families_tax_credit.py (credit amount) applies the waiver:
is_disabled_dependent = person("is_tax_unit_dependent", period) & person(
"is_permanently_and_totally_disabled", period
)
child_count = tax_unit.sum(
(person("is_qualifying_child_dependent", period) | is_disabled_dependent)
& has_tin
)
wa_working_families_tax_credit_maximum_qualifying_income.py (income ceiling) does not:
washington_child_count = tax_unit.sum(
person("is_qualifying_child_dependent", period) & person("has_tin", period)
)
A permanently and totally disabled dependent old enough to fail the normal age test (19/24) counts as a child for the credit amount but not for the income limit.
Legal basis (the ceiling should count them)
- RCW 82.08.0206(2) defines a WFTC qualifying child as "a qualifying child as defined by Title 26 U.S.C. Sec. 32 of the internal revenue code, except the child may have a valid individual taxpayer identification number in lieu of a social security number." Section 32(c)(3) takes its definition from §152(c), and §152(c)(3)(B) waives the age test for someone permanently and totally disabled. The statute's "maximum qualifying income" is the §32 maximum AGI, which is tiered by the number of qualifying children — so a disabled adult qualifying child raises the income limit, not just the credit tier. https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=82.08.0206
- WA DOR's application instructions state it directly: "If your qualifying child is permanently and totally disabled at any time in 2023, there is no age requirement," with a worked example of a 24-year-old completely and totally disabled nephew who can be claimed ("age is not a factor in his qualification"). The same instructions tie the AGI limits ($17,640 / $46,560 / $52,918 / $56,838 single in 2023) to the number of qualifying children. https://workingfamiliescredit.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2024-01/WFTC_AppInstr_English_2023.pdf#page=5
Example failure (2023)
Single Washington parent, age 40, files with an ITIN, $20,000 earnings; supports their 30-year-old permanently and totally disabled son (dependent, has ITIN, meets relationship/residency/joint-return tests).
- Per DOR: one qualifying child → $46,560 income limit → full one-child credit of $625.
- Model:
washington_child_count = 0 (fails the age test), federal_child_count = 0 (no SSN), so the ceiling variable returns the childless limit $17,640; $20,000 > $17,640 → $0.
Second facet — even under the childless ceiling the phase-out window is mis-positioned: same family at $16,000 earnings gets a phase-out start of $17,640 − $5,000 = $12,640 instead of $46,560 − $5,000 = $41,560, paying ~$239 instead of the full $625.
Trigger scope
Only bites when the disabled dependent lacks an SSN (ITIN): with an SSN, the federal eitc_child_count already includes the §152(c)(3)(B) waiver and the ceiling's max_(federal_child_count, washington_child_count) papers over the gap. With an ITIN — exactly the population the WFTC's state-only path exists for — both counts are 0.
Fix
Mirror the | is_disabled_dependent term into the ceiling's washington_child_count so both variables count qualifying children identically. Add a YAML test for the example above (ITIN filer, disabled adult ITIN dependent, income between the childless and one-child ceilings → full one-child credit).
Found during review of PR #9351 (pre-existing bug — it predates that PR, which rewrites the same call site for the indexing fix).
Summary
wa_working_families_tax_credit_maximum_qualifying_incomecounts qualifying children without the IRC 152(c)(3)(B) permanently-and-totally-disabled age waiver, while the mainwa_working_families_tax_creditvariable counts them with it. On the state-only (ITIN) path, a family with a disabled adult qualifying child gets one-child credit parameters but a childless income ceiling — so the model denies or under-pays the credit.The inconsistency
wa_working_families_tax_credit.py(credit amount) applies the waiver:wa_working_families_tax_credit_maximum_qualifying_income.py(income ceiling) does not:A permanently and totally disabled dependent old enough to fail the normal age test (19/24) counts as a child for the credit amount but not for the income limit.
Legal basis (the ceiling should count them)
Example failure (2023)
Single Washington parent, age 40, files with an ITIN, $20,000 earnings; supports their 30-year-old permanently and totally disabled son (dependent, has ITIN, meets relationship/residency/joint-return tests).
washington_child_count= 0 (fails the age test),federal_child_count= 0 (no SSN), so the ceiling variable returns the childless limit $17,640; $20,000 > $17,640 → $0.Second facet — even under the childless ceiling the phase-out window is mis-positioned: same family at $16,000 earnings gets a phase-out start of $17,640 − $5,000 = $12,640 instead of $46,560 − $5,000 = $41,560, paying ~$239 instead of the full $625.
Trigger scope
Only bites when the disabled dependent lacks an SSN (ITIN): with an SSN, the federal
eitc_child_countalready includes the §152(c)(3)(B) waiver and the ceiling'smax_(federal_child_count, washington_child_count)papers over the gap. With an ITIN — exactly the population the WFTC's state-only path exists for — both counts are 0.Fix
Mirror the
| is_disabled_dependentterm into the ceiling'swashington_child_countso both variables count qualifying children identically. Add a YAML test for the example above (ITIN filer, disabled adult ITIN dependent, income between the childless and one-child ceilings → full one-child credit).Found during review of PR #9351 (pre-existing bug — it predates that PR, which rewrites the same call site for the indexing fix).