This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 17, 2023. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
Replies: 1 comment 4 replies
|
@liusy182 thanks for bringing this up. I agree this is an issue to be solved. Between the two proposed approaches, I think having |
4 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
The API mxnet.gluon.SymbolBlock.export exports input names by following the convention below according to documentation:
The counterpart mxnet.gluon.SymbolBlock.imports requires the
input_namesto be specified as the second parameter.This is problematic for clients who use this set of APIs. E.g. a client who have previously exported the model may not know the format of
input_nameswhen it tries to do import later.I see there are 2 solutions for this problem:
mxnet.gluon.SymbolBlock.importsbeing able to infer theinput_names. (preferred)mxnet.gluon.SymbolBlock.exportreturn theinput_nameswhich can later be used by the import.Does gluon support any of the above functionality in anyways? If not, would it be a good idea to support this?
All reactions