You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I know that the "Message list order" setting exists and once the Date sent option works, one can set it to whatever they like. However, here are a few quick reasons why sentAt should be considered as the default:
SMTP is not a real time protocol. The safeguards involve multi-day holding queues before a message is delivered
Sys admins like seeing event messages in the order they happened, especially around the time of outages when delays are more likely to happen
"No boss, I didn't wait 2 days. I replied to your message within 5 minutes but the mail server delayed it"
Convention. Pick any other mail client, they all seem to default to date sent as the sort by date
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I know that the "Message list order" setting exists and once the Date sent option works, one can set it to whatever they like. However, here are a few quick reasons why sentAt should be considered as the default:
Would be interested in hearing your views.
All reactions