I'm working on aggregating Tree-sitter parsers for easier usage, and would be interested in incorporating yours. I try to maintain wide compatability with open source policies in effect, where licenses such as the one you are using may be considered incomplete or unserious. WTFPL does not for example disclaim warranty or liability, which makes usage of works with the license difficult under the aforementioned policies.
If you would like to improve compatability for use cases such as mine, I would recommend that you dual-license your work under an OSI-approved permissive license, like MIT-0 or 0BSD.
I'm working on aggregating Tree-sitter parsers for easier usage, and would be interested in incorporating yours. I try to maintain wide compatability with open source policies in effect, where licenses such as the one you are using may be considered incomplete or unserious. WTFPL does not for example disclaim warranty or liability, which makes usage of works with the license difficult under the aforementioned policies.
If you would like to improve compatability for use cases such as mine, I would recommend that you dual-license your work under an OSI-approved permissive license, like MIT-0 or 0BSD.