Provider backlog: what would you like picked up next?

[dngr2]

I opened three PRs against existing issues over the last day:

• fix(http-provider): stop duplicating results on notify #6687 — the HTTP provider recorded every result twice, because _notify() called the public query() and both wrappers append ([🐛 Bug]: HTTP provider action results duplicated in workflow execution output #6431)
• fix(http-provider): don't double-encode a templated JSON body #6688 — the HTTP provider double-encoded a templated {{ alert }} body, so endpoints got a quoted string instead of an object ([🐛 Bug]: HTTP provider sends double-encoded JSON when workflow body uses {{ alert }} template #6547)
• feat(prometheus): expose an instant PromQL query as a provider method #6689 — the Prometheus provider reported methods: [], so PromQL wasn't reachable from the UI or from agents even though _query() was already there ([➕ Feature]: Add method to query prometheus provider #6475)

Each has tests written before the fix, and CI is green on all three.

One thing I ran into while working out what to pick up, in case it's useful: a good share of the open provider requests are filed by the vendor themselves. #6624 (Plivo) and #6600 (Flowtriq) are both from someone at that company with the implementation already in hand, which is completely reasonable — it just makes the backlog hard to read from outside, since those look identical to unclaimed work until you check who filed them.

So rather than keep guessing: is there work you'd actually like picked up? I'd rather take your priorities in order, one PR at a time, than open things nobody asked for. I'm most useful on the Python side — providers, the HTTP and workflow plumbing, test coverage, CI.

And if provider or bugfix work is something you fund, I'd like to understand how that works and what counts as a fundable unit. If it isn't, the list is still worth having and I'll keep picking things off it.