Contribution of interest?

[agent-927]

Hello people,

I've been going through the hindsight codebase quite extensively to figure out how well it suits what I'm trying to achieve.

I've formed a very opinion that some design decisions may have been taken with "agent memory" goal in mind, for instance "decay window" and "observation trend window".

I've prepared the attached plan that I would be interested in contributing if you'll have it.
TLDR: essentially extending some of the configs _CONFIGURABLE_FIELDS, adding storage and retrieval capabilities, enriching some aspects of the data stored.

Are you able to review the attached document and confirm whether you would

• welcome such changes
• categorically deny such changes
• handpick some changes?

I don't think this is "major rework", but I would also want someone on your end to properly vet the resulting work.. You definitely know your thing better than I do, and likewise Postgres..

Not sure on my timeframe at this stage. If interested, I'm happy to work with someone on your side to get this out.

PRD-Phase2-Hindsight-Patches copy.md

[agent-927]

@nicoloboschi @benfrank241 just in case you missed this, I do think these suggested changes would allow hindsight to scale beyond the current "memory for agent" current product positioning. Happy to discuss.

[benfrank241]

Hey thanks for the writeup! Feel free to open up separate PRs and we will have a look.

[agent-927]

Sorry folks, I posted this in the "Ideas" section hoping for a discussion about "ideas". It doesn't look like adoption and community is a thing for hindsight?

@benfrank241 with all due respect if you wanted a PR, you can hand the document over to your favourite agent.

What I asked is whether this direction made sense to your project, that you own and commercialise, or whether I'm plain wasting my time. It's quite possible that I'm not a typical customer, or likewise that I'm facing problems other are facing.

I don't blindly let my agents deploy PRs on my behalf - I have pride in great software and my time is spend maintaining standards, strategy, and alignment. This is not a 1-line bug fix. So unless someone on your side has the business acumen or just 5 minutes to go through it, I'm going to close for good hygiene...

Are you able to review the attached document and confirm whether you would

• welcome such changes
• categorically deny such changes
• handpick some changes?