Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
User workflow
A Dot presents a Markdown draft for owner review before saving it to a Space. When a save response is lost or the card reconnects, an unchanged review should recover the same saved page. If the title, content, or destination changes while the thread and tool-call ID stay the same, the card should identify the existing save and require a new review for the changed draft.
Change
Reproduction and verification
On the pinned base commit
c2569bb6, saving draft A and then submitting draft B with the same thread and tool-call ID returned HTTP 201 with page A. With this change, the second request returns HTTP 409; the original page and receipt remain intact.Regression coverage exercises identical retries, changed title/content/destination, title normalization, receipt recovery after page edits, Space revocation, database migration/restart, and client recovery before a decision. The existing page-review recovery tests continue to pass.
npm run check-format,npm run lint,npm run typecheck,npm run build: passed.