Skip to content

test(build): every extension the pi manifest names ships in the published package - #449

Merged
Mearman merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
test/pi-manifest-entry-is-packed
Oct 22, 2026
Merged

Mearman merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
test/pi-manifest-entry-is-packed

Conversation

@Mearman

@Mearman Mearman commented Oct 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

pi install npm:agent-comms once reported success and then could not load the extension, because the pi manifest named a path that files did not publish (#412, #440). Nothing in the suite compared the manifest with the tarball, so it went unnoticed until a user hit it.

The new integration test reads pi.extensions from package.json and checks every entry exists in the repository and appears in npm pack --dry-run's file list, the same selection a publish uses. It passes on main and fails when src is dropped from files. The README's pi section now says why one manifest entry serves both the npm and git installs, and that a git install has no built dashboard.

…shed package

pi install npm:agent-comms once reported success and then could not load
the extension, because the manifest named a path the package did not
publish. Compare the manifest with npm pack's own file selection so a files
entry or ignore rule that drops the entry fails the suite.
The manifest points at the TypeScript source so that the npm and git
installs load the same file, and a git install has no frontend build, so
its dashboard routes answer 503.
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
🔒 Security Review ⚠️ Failed 2026-10-22T07:09:13.549026Z
We couldn’t complete this review. Comment @codex security review to try again.
bff778e PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This security review couldn’t start because the paying account has exhausted its Codex allowance and has insufficient available credits. The payer can check their balance and add credits in the Codex usage dashboard, then try again. If you do not manage the paying account, contact this repository's admins.

@Mearman
Mearman merged commit c553bb5 into main Oct 22, 2026
8 checks passed
@Mearman
Mearman deleted the test/pi-manifest-entry-is-packed branch October 22, 2026 07:13
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 8.15.11 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant