You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
docs(deployment): configuration page still says the S3 endpoint and region can be omitted if you use Minio #7929
#7927 / #7928 moved the development and CI stacks to Silo (pgsty/silo) and renamed MinIO to Silo in the documentation that names it as the object storage of the stack. A second git grep -i minio over main after the merge finds two prose mentions that were left behind, both in docs/docs/deployment/configuration.md (section "S3 bucket"):
row minio.endpoint (line 212): "This parameter value can be omitted if you use Minio as an S3 Bucket Service."
row minio.bucket-region (line 218): same sentence.
Everything else that still matches is the contract Silo keeps and stays as is: the minio.* / MINIO_* configuration keys and environment variables, the openaev-dev-minio / openaev-test-minio service names, the /minio/health/live healthcheck route, the MinIO Java SDK (io.minio, MinioClient, MinioDriver, MinioService) and its comments, the "Silo (MinIO fork)" wording introduced by #7928, and the historical 2.0.0 breaking-change note about the default bucket renaming.
Current workaround
None needed, documentation only.
Proposed solution
Say "if you use Silo as an S3 Bucket Service" in both rows, like OpenCTI-Platform/opencti#18244 does for the same page of the OpenCTI documentation.
Activity
docs(deployment): rename the last MinIO mentions to Silo in the confi…