Skip to content

should a check valve be a valve or a pipe? #106

Description

@jamesuber

Right now it seems to be considered to be a valve, different from a pipe. Result is that when you change a pipe to a check valve, then it gets confusing about whether that's really a different type of object, and existing data connections can be severed. For example a valve can accept a setting, but that doesn't apply logically to a check valve, so its more like a pipe in that case. however it's useful to keep track of check valves, different from pipes. So no change should be made to harm our ability to do that.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions