Conversation
termanix
requested review from
Marshall-Hallenbeck,
NeffIsBack,
mpgn and
zblurx
as code owners
September 18, 2026 12:08
Collaborator
|
Nicee I hadn't thought of that, good addition ! |
azoxlpf
suggested changes
Sep 18, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR adds NTLM hash authentication for the
getKerberosTGTstep on ResetNightmare module when requesting a TGT for the password change operation.This allows the exploit to work using the UPN account's NT hash when its plaintext password is not available.
Type of change
Insert an "x" inside the brackets for relevant items (do not delete options)
Setup guide for the review
Tested on HTB Rebound machine. (I can't use my local lab at the moment)
Screenshots (if appropriate):
Checklist:
Insert an "x" inside the brackets for completed and relevant items (do not delete options)
poetry run ruff check ., use--fixto automatically fix what it can)tests/e2e_commands.txtfile if necessary (new modules or features are required to be added to the e2e tests)