With the introduction of Short-term certificates, it is possible to issue end-entity Subscriber Certificates without a CRLDP extension or OCSP access location.
RFC 9608 describes an extension that could be used to signal the lack of revocation information.
Is this worth adding to the TLS BRs?
With the introduction of Short-term certificates, it is possible to issue end-entity Subscriber Certificates without a CRLDP extension or OCSP access location.
RFC 9608 describes an extension that could be used to signal the lack of revocation information.
Is this worth adding to the TLS BRs?