fix: correct basic message connectionId error - #1771
shivansh45334 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
Navigate logical layers of code changes, visualize relationships, and explore their blast radius. Warning Review limit reachedYou've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. Next included review available in 50 minutes. View limit detailsLimit details: You’ve used the included review currently available. Review configuration: ⚙️ Run configuration
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configuration
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe basic-message endpoint now returns a dedicated error message when the ChangesBasic message connection ID error
Priority: ⬇️ Low Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Change: Bug fix · Severity of issue fixed: Low Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to The basic-message endpoint now returns a more specific error message when connectionId is invalid. Other endpoints keep their existing message. No merge-blocking risk was found. 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❓ 1❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Full details: Linked Issues checkExplanation Issue [ ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Signed-off-by: Shivansh <shivansh45334@gamil.com>
03aeb71 to
47d7761
Compare
|



Description
Fixes the incorrect validation error message returned when an invalid
connectionId is provided to the basic message endpoint.
Changes
One important point: I did not change the shared invalidConnectionId message, because that message is also used by the normal connection-details endpoint. I instead introduced a dedicated message for the basic-message endpoint, keeping the change narrowly scoped.
Issue
Closes #1229
Summary by CodeRabbit