Skip to content

GLSP-1682: Update docs after the glsp-core consolidation - #114

Merged
tortmayr merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
glsp-1682-doc-cleanup
Sep 17, 2026
Merged

tortmayr merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
glsp-1682-doc-cleanup

Conversation

@tortmayr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What it does

Small documentation follow-up to the glsp-core consolidation. Docs only, no behavior change.

  • Point the quickstart component doc comments at the Node server sources in
    glsp-core/packages/server/server
    instead of the retired glsp-server-node repo
  • Drop the outdated prose structure list from the README; the package table below it is
    complete and already covers the e2e/playwright-vscode and e2e/workflow-vscode-e2e packages
  • Link the glsp-core workflow example section directly via the #workflow-diagram-example
    anchor, matching the parallel glsp-server link

Part of: eclipse-glsp/glsp#1682

How to test

Doc-only change; review by reading the diff and following the links.

  • pnpm lint and pnpm format:check pass locally
  • All updated URLs and the #workflow-diagram-example anchor verified against the current glsp-core main

Follow-ups

Changelog

  • This PR should be mentioned in the changelog
  • This PR introduces a breaking change (if yes, provide more details below for the changelog and the migration guide)

- Point the quickstart component doc comments at the Node server
  sources in glsp-core instead of the retired glsp-server-node repo
- Drop the outdated prose structure list from the README; the package
  table below it is complete and already covers the e2e packages
- Link the glsp-core workflow example section directly, matching the
  parallel glsp-server link

Part of: eclipse-glsp/glsp#1682
@tortmayr
tortmayr merged commit 9fc44ee into master Sep 17, 2026
5 checks passed
@tortmayr
tortmayr deleted the glsp-1682-doc-cleanup branch September 17, 2026 14:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant