Skip to content

import: experimental designs with more than one covariate  #29

Description

@lgeistlinger

@lgeistlinger , thank-you for the update! (esp. import).

# I used apeglm for the res:
res <- lfcShrink(dds, coef="FM_1_vs_0", type="apeglm")
se <- import(dds, res, from = "DESeq2")
Error in .importFromDESeq2(obj, res) : 
  all(rnames %in% colnames(res)) is not TRUE
colnames(res)
[1] "baseMean"       "log2FoldChange" "lfcSE"         
[4] "pvalue"         "padj"  

# repeated without "apeglm"
res <- results(dds)
se <- import(dds, res, from = "DESeq2")
Error in .importFromDESeq2(obj, res) : 
Supported experimental designs include binary group comparisons 
with an optional blocking variable for paired samples / sample batches

design(dds)
~ age + batch + condition

I have 4 questions for you:

  1. Is LFC shrinkage needed / recommended with EnrichmentBrowser?

  2. I have to use age (scaled, continuous) and batch (binary) as covariates to analyze for my condition of interest (binary)? How can I use this information with EnrichmentBrowser to avoid any false positives?

  3. To circumvent covariate problem, I was thinking of using ranked gene list with pi scores res$pi <- res$log2FoldChange*(-log(res$pvalue)), can I do this for downstream topology-based methods in EnrichmentBrowser, if yes, how?

  4. Could you suggest a better way to rank / score genes? I am not sure how should the tie broken in case of non-unique scores.

Originally posted by @vivek-verma202 in #23 (comment)

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions