feat: add fuzz integration [take two] - #154
Open
Davidson-Souza wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
Davidson-Souza
force-pushed
the
feat/fuzz-take2
branch
from
August 26, 2026 18:57
4ed5154 to
5659556
Compare
Contributor
|
Could add a fuzz CI job that runs |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Partially replaces #92
Replaces #149
This pull request adds fuzzing capabilities to
rustreexo, including targets to test our cryptographic code, focusing onstump— since this is the implementation we currently use in floresta.The first target tests proof and stump [de]serialization, making sure it doesn't panic even on malformed inputs. The second creates intentionally invalid proofs and checks how our stump behaves.
These targets were initially written by Bruno in #149, I just cleaned them up and fixed problems found while running them.