Skip to content

disclaim warranty - #5

Merged
wsor4035 merged 4 commits into
mt-historical:masterfrom
The4codeblocks:patch-1
May 25, 2026
Merged

wsor4035 merged 4 commits into
mt-historical:masterfrom
The4codeblocks:patch-1

Conversation

@The4codeblocks

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

fixes #3

@The4codeblocks The4codeblocks changed the title disclaim warranty (NO EFFECT UNTIL MERGED UPSTREAM) disclaim warranty Jan 4, 2026
@wsor4035

wsor4035 commented Jan 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

while mit0 and 0bsd are essentially the same thing, iirc 0bsd is the more common. didnt bother to check (someone should), but iirc it doesnt make a difference for including it in 2 clause bsd, mit, etc in the future

Comment thread LICENSE Outdated
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
License: WTFPL
License: MIT-0

@TheEt1234 TheEt1234 Jan 4, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

also could paste in the license text itself so that hypothetically, a user without an internet connection can still be aware of their rights

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

as long as its the spdx identifier, dont care

@The4codeblocks

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

didnt bother to check (someone should)

I did, and it appears that MIT0 is verboser, but do basically the same thing

@wsor4035

wsor4035 commented Jan 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@wsor4035

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

my suggestion just duel license and we dont have to care and can close this (also can remove one in the future then)

@The4codeblocks

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

my suggestion just duel license and we dont have to care and can close this (also can remove one in the future then)

between what and what exactly? (MIT0 and BSD0?)
and how should dual-licensing be communicated? "MIT-0 / 0BSD"?

@wsor4035

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

MIT-0 OR 0BSD

@The4codeblocks

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

MIT-0 OR 0BSD

done

@wsor4035

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

only edited one place, not both

@The4codeblocks

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

done

@wsor4035
wsor4035 merged commit 264eb2d into mt-historical:master May 25, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Relicense code under MIT

3 participants