Bugfix/add missing deletion workflow job - #81
Conversation
…rkflow is triggered.
… component, and clean OpenApiConfiguration.
| tags: | ||
| - ProvisionResults | ||
| summary: Request App Support to do operations to delete provision status component (and dependencies) from the file | ||
| summary: Delete a provision status component via AWX workflow |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd remove the "status" word here
| @Slf4j | ||
| public class ProvisionResultsApiFacade { | ||
|
|
||
| private static final String DELETION_WORKFLOW_ID = "deletion_workflow"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What if, instead of defining private variables (in multiple places currently? idk), we put these parameter names inside a class that represents the Provision action, or has something to do with it? This way we could centralize the information regarding this, and avoid having defined n times the same vars in different places.
This is more an idea than a suggestion for now, we could do it asap or we could open a task for it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nah, it is only used in here, I have basically to remove it in the other place.
|
2 participants
No description provided.