Skip to content

Drop "no DNSSEC" from Quad9's unfiltered upstream - #1442

Merged
yubiuser merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/quad9-dnssec
Oct 23, 2026
Merged

yubiuser merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
fix/quad9-dnssec

Conversation

@DL6ER

@DL6ER DL6ER commented Oct 23, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thank you for your contribution to the Pi-hole Community!

Please read the comments below to help us consider your Pull Request.

We are all volunteers and completing the process outlined will help us review your commits quicker.

Please make sure you

  1. Base your code and PRs against the repositories developmental branch.
  2. Sign Off all commits as we enforce the DCO for all contributions
  3. Sign all your commits as they must have verified signatures
  4. File a pull request for any change that requires changes to our documentation at our documentation repo

What does this PR aim to accomplish?:

Quad9 validates DNSSEC on all of its service endpoints now, including the unfiltered 9.9.9.10 set (see their service addresses page), but the upstream provider guide still lists it as "no DNSSEC". Reported in pi-hole/FTL#3280.

How does this PR accomplish the above?:

Drops "no DNSSEC" from the heading of the unfiltered set. Matching changes for FTL and the installer are in pi-hole/FTL#3284 and pi-hole/pi-hole#6740.

Link documentation PRs if any are needed to support this PR:

N/A


By submitting this pull request, I confirm the following:

  1. I have read and understood the contributors guide, as well as this entire template. I understand which branch to base my commits and Pull Requests against.
  2. I have commented my proposed changes within the code and I have tested my changes.
  3. I am willing to help maintain this change if there are issues with it later.
  4. It is compatible with the EUPL 1.2 license
  5. I have squashed any insignificant commits. (git rebase)
  6. I have checked that another pull request for this purpose does not exist.
  7. I have considered, and confirmed that this submission will be valuable to others.
  8. I accept that this submission may not be used, and the pull request closed at the will of the maintainer.
  9. I give this submission freely, and claim no ownership to its content.

  • I have read the above and my PR is ready for review. Check this box to confirm

Quad9 validates DNSSEC on all of its service endpoints, including the unfiltered `9.9.9.10` set.

Signed-off-by: DL6ER <dl6er@dl6er.de>
@DL6ER
DL6ER requested a review from a team as a code owner October 23, 2026 17:36
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 23, 2026 17:36

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has insufficient remaining quota.

@netlify

netlify Bot commented Oct 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Deploy Preview for pihole-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 8d7cd22
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/pihole-docs/deploys/6adb9b23ff506eaafedca1c2
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1442--pihole-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
🤖 Make changes Run an agent on this branch

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@yubiuser
yubiuser merged commit 82f6af8 into master Oct 23, 2026
12 checks passed
@yubiuser
yubiuser deleted the fix/quad9-dnssec branch October 23, 2026 17:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants