refactor: rename service user variables - #1802
Conversation
|
@RushikeshBhavsar3605 is attempting to deploy a commit to the Raystack Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
📝 WalkthroughSummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughChangesService-user naming cleanup
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
b6871a1 to
78159c5
Compare
|
This is amazing, was hoping someone would pick this up. Will take this up for review first thing tomorrow. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
Changes look good to me, will merge in a few minutes. |
Summary
Renames variables that hold service users to use explicit service user naming, avoiding confusion with human users.
Closes #1726
Changes
user,users, andcurrentUservariables that represent service users.serviceUser/serviceUsersnaming andsuin short loops.Technical Details
This is a naming-only refactor. No application logic or SQL queries were changed.
Test Plan
Manual testing completed
Build and type checking passes
Verified the repo-wide sweep for remaining service-user naming occurrences.
SQL Safety (if your PR touches
*_repository.goorgoqu.*)No SQL/query logic was changed.
?placeholders,goqu.Ex{}, orgoqu.Record{}— neverfmt.Sprintfor+building a query that gets executed.ToSQL()callers capture and forward params (query, params, err := stmt.ToSQL(); db.…Context(ctx, …, query, params...)). Neverquery, _, err := ….?placeholders inside single-quoted SQL literals ingoqu.L(usemake_interval(hours => ?)-style functions instead).//nolint:forbidigoor// #nosec G20xannotation has a one-line justification on the same line that a reviewer can verify.