Skip to content

image-controller update - #15108

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
image-controller
Oct 25, 2026
Merged

openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
image-controller

Conversation

@rh-tap-build-team

@rh-tap-build-team rh-tap-build-team Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Included PRs:

Changelog

@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested review from mmorhun and rcerven October 23, 2026 18:12
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Kustomize Render Diff

Comparing a9ca21a97 → 9ef9e4949

Component Environment Changes
components/image-controller/development development +1 -1
components/image-controller/staging/base staging +1 -1

Total: 2 components, +2 -2 lines

📋 Full diff available in the workflow summary and as a downloadable artifact.

@fullsend-ai-review

fullsend-ai-review Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Finished Review · ✅ Success · Started 6:13 PM UTC · Completed 6:18 PM UTC

Commit: da8bbf2 · View workflow run →

Runtime: claude · Model: opus → claude-opus-5-5 · Effort: high · Cost: $1.72

@fullsend-ai-review fullsend-ai-review Bot added the risk/low PR risk: low label Oct 23, 2026
@fullsend-ai-review

fullsend-ai-review Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Risk Assessment: low (1/5)

Details

Bot-authored image tag update touching 2 config-only Kustomize files with 8 lines changed, no protected paths, no dependency changes, low churn, and single-author history produces a composite score of 1.0 across both tiers (0.62×1.0 + 0.38×1.0 = 1.0).

Previous run

Risk Assessment: low (1/5)

Details

Bot-authored commit-SHA bump across 2 config-only kustomization files in development and staging overlays, with only 8 lines changed, no protected paths, no security-sensitive or dependency file changes, and uniformly low git churn—every signal maps to minimum risk.

@fullsend-ai-review

fullsend-ai-review Bot commented Oct 23, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Looks good to me

Previous run

Looks good to me

fullsend-ai-review[bot]

This comment was marked as outdated.

@fullsend-ai-review fullsend-ai-review Bot added the ready-for-merge All reviewers approved — ready to merge label Oct 23, 2026
@konflux-ci-qe-bot

konflux-ci-qe-bot commented Oct 23, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Pipeline Failure Analysis

Category: Infrastructure

The redhat-appstudio-report tool failed to locate the Prow job's artifact directory in Google Cloud Storage, preventing the generation of the conformance test report.

📋 Technical Details

Immediate Cause

The redhat-appstudio-report tool encountered an error when attempting to scan and retrieve artifacts for the Prow job 7cdb6f8d-8716-475f-bb35-f7c9553579ad from the test-platform-results Google Cloud Storage bucket, specifically failing to determine the artifact directory's prefix.

Contributing Factors

No contributing factors were identified from the provided analyses or additional context. The issue appears to be an access or pathing problem specific to the redhat-appstudio-report tool's interaction with the GCS bucket for this particular Prow job's artifacts.

Impact

The failure of the redhat-appstudio-report tool to access job artifacts prevented the successful completion of the reporting phase for the konflux-ring-deployments-conformance-tests, meaning no formal report could be generated or published, despite the potential success of the underlying conformance tests.

🔍 Evidence

konflux-ring-deployments-conformance-tests/redhat-appstudio-report

Category: infrastructure
Root Cause: The redhat-appstudio-report tool failed to locate or access the artifact directory for the Prow job 7cdb6f8d-8716-475f-bb35-f7c9553579ad within the test-platform-results Google Cloud Storage bucket, preventing it from scanning the necessary artifacts to generate the report.

Logs:

artifacts/konflux-ring-deployments-conformance-tests/redhat-appstudio-report/build-log.txt line 97
Error: failed to scan artifacts for prow job 7cdb6f8d-8716-475f-bb35-f7c9553579ad: failed to get artifact directory prefix: failed to determine artifact directory's prefix - prow job url: 'https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results-public/pr-logs/pull/redhat-appstudio_infra-deployments/15108/pull-ci-redhat-appstudio-infra-deployments-main-konflux-ring-deployments-conformance-tests/2114426493554659328', bucket name: 'test-platform-results'

Analysis powered by prow-failure-analysis | Build: 2114426493554659328

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Oct 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mmorhun, rh-tap-build-team[bot]

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@mmorhun

mmorhun commented Oct 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/retest

1 similar comment
@mmorhun

mmorhun commented Oct 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/retest

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 24, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 61.65%. Comparing base (a9ca21a) to head (786f10d).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #15108   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   61.65%   61.65%           
=======================================
  Files          24       24           
  Lines        1630     1630           
=======================================
  Hits         1005     1005           
  Misses        542      542           
  Partials       83       83           
Flag Coverage Δ
go 61.65% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the lgtm label Oct 25, 2026
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Oct 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@qodo-for-redhat-appstudio

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Code Review by Qodo

🐞 Bugs (0) 📘 Rule violations (0) 📎 Requirement gaps (0)

Great, no issues found!

Qodo reviewed your code and found no material issues that require review

Powered by Qodo

@glevi-rh glevi-rh added the lgtm label Oct 25, 2026
@fullsend-ai-review

fullsend-ai-review Bot commented Oct 25, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Finished Review · ✅ Success · Started 6:39 PM UTC · Completed 6:45 PM UTC

Commit: 786f10d · View workflow run →

Runtime: claude · Model: opus → claude-opus-5-5 · Effort: high · Cost: $2.02

@fullsend-ai-review
fullsend-ai-review Bot dismissed their stale review October 25, 2026 18:45

Superseded by updated review

@openshift-merge-bot
openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit 0a7f442 into main Oct 25, 2026
47 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants